[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-105-1-brokerage-law-017":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"不動產經紀相關法規概要","brokerage-law","經紀相關法規 · Brokerage Regulation","經紀相關法規","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-105-1-不動產經紀相關法規概要-017","house-105-1-brokerage-law-017",105,1,17,"甲建商為銷售新屋建案，委請廣告代理業者乙為整體廣告行銷，由乙請來知名歌星丙代言房屋銷售。乙基於甲的指示，請求丙於廣告案中大力推薦該建案房屋地點近臺北市，開車只要 15 分鐘，每天可在天然溫泉泡湯，然事實上，甲、乙、丙均明知該建案房屋距離臺北市有相當距離，搭高鐵要 30 分鐘，且無天然溫泉。試問甲、乙、丙針對虛偽不實廣告行為，應負何種責任？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"甲、乙、丙均各自單獨負損害賠償責任","甲、乙應各自單獨負損害賠償責任，丙僅廣告薦證而無責任","甲應負損害賠償責任，乙、丙應與廣告主甲負連帶損害賠償責任","甲應負損害賠償責任，乙應與廣告主甲負連帶損害賠償責任，丙僅廣告薦證而無責任","C",null,"本題考點：不實廣告的責任主體——廣告主、廣告代理業與廣告薦證者的連帶損害賠償。\n【正解理由】依《公平交易法》第 21 條第一項，事業不得在商品或廣告上，對於與商品相關而足以影響交易決定之事項，為虛偽不實或引人錯誤之表示；地點、交通與溫泉條件均屬同條第二項所稱具有招徠效果之相關事項。責任分配見同條第五項：「廣告代理業在明知或可得而知情形下，仍製作或設計有引人錯誤之廣告，與廣告主負連帶損害賠償責任……廣告薦證者明知或可得而知其所從事之薦證有引人錯誤之虞，而仍為薦證者，與廣告主負連帶損害賠償責任」。廣告主自負賠償責任，明知不實的廣告代理業與知名薦證者均與之連帶，故選 C。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 依《公平交易法》第 21 條第五項，廣告代理業與薦證者須與廣告主負連帶責任，而非各自單獨負責，本項錯誤。\n(B) 於廣告中反映其對商品之意見或親身體驗結果之人，屬《公平交易法》第 21 條第六項之廣告薦證者，明知有引人錯誤之虞仍薦證者須與廣告主連帶，本項謂其無責任，錯誤。\n(C) 廣告主依《公平交易法》第 21 條第一項應負賠償責任，明知不實之廣告代理業與薦證者依同條第五項與之連帶，本項與條文相符，正確。\n(D) 廣告代理業連帶無誤，但薦證者免責與《公平交易法》第 21 條第五項不符，知名公眾人物亦不適用該項但書之十倍上限。\n【記憶點】不實廣告「主、代、證」三方連帶，非知名薦證者才享報酬十倍上限。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-016","有關公平交易法對獨占規範之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",16,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-018","下列何種情形，係屬於公平交易法所稱之結合？",18,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-015","事業不得為聯合行為。但因經濟不景氣，致同一行業之事業難以繼續維持或生產過剩，為有計畫適應需求而限制價格之共同行為，而有益於整體經濟與公共利益，經申請主管機關許可者，不在此限。主管機關為許可時，應附多少時間之期限？",15,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-019","公平交易法所規範不動產經紀業者涉及違法聯合行為之態樣，下列何者不屬之？",19,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-014","依公平交易法規定，主管機關為強化聯合行為查處，促進市場競爭秩序之健全發展，得設立何種基金？",14,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-020","關於不動產經紀業者之行為，下列何者係法律所允許？",20,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-brokerage-law-017",114,"區分所有權人會議之決議，依公寓大廈管理條例，除規約另有規定，應有區分所有權人⑴以上及其區分所有權比例合計 ⑵以上出席，以出席人數 ⑶以上及其區分所有權比例占出席人數區分所有權 ⑷以上之同意行之。上述⑴⑵⑶⑷之比例，依序應為多少？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-brokerage-law-017",113,"甲透過仲介公司看房，對某一間公寓頗為滿意，想請父母看房再決定，仲介公司業務員請他先付 10 萬元斡旋，可保留優先購買之權利，於是甲支付 10 萬元，並簽訂「不動產購買意願書」，下列何者錯誤？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-112-1-brokerage-law-017",112,"關於聯合行為，下列何者正確？",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-017",111,"依公寓大廈管理條例之規定，下列之定義何者正確？",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-110-1-brokerage-law-017",110,"定型化契約中之定型化契約條款於下列何種情形下，其條款不構成契約之內容，但消費者得主張該條款仍構成契約之內容？",1786689136214]