[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":55},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-105-1-brokerage-law-026":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"不動產經紀相關法規概要","brokerage-law","經紀相關法規 · Brokerage Regulation","經紀相關法規","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-105-1-不動產經紀相關法規概要-026","house-105-1-brokerage-law-026",105,1,26,"依消費者保護法規定，下列敘述何者正確？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"企業經營者於商品或服務具有危害消費者生命、身體、健康、財產之可能者，未於明顯處為警告標示及緊急處理危險之方法者應負賠償責任。但企業經營者能證明其無過失者，法院得減輕或免除其賠償責任","商品或服務因其後有較佳之商品或服務，得被推定不符合當時科技或專業水準可合理期待之安全性","從事經銷之企業經營者，改裝、分裝商品或變更服務內容者，視為從事設計、生產、製造商品或提供服務之企業經營者","企業經營者對消費者或第三人之損害賠償責任，得預先約定限制但不得約定免除","C",null,"本題考點：商品責任的四個基本規則——警告標示與無過失的減責效果、後出商品不影響安全性認定、經銷者改裝分裝的責任升級，以及損害賠償責任不得預先限制或免除。\n【正解理由】依《消費者保護法》第 8 條第二項，從事經銷之企業經營者，「改裝、分裝商品或變更服務內容者，視為第七條之企業經營者」，也就是責任層級由經銷者升格為設計、生產、製造商品或提供服務之企業經營者，本選項與條文相符，故選 C。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 錯在減責幅度。《消費者保護法》第 7 條第三項但書規定，企業經營者能證明其無過失者，法院得「減輕」其賠償責任，條文並沒有「或免除」。\n(B) 錯在方向相反。《消費者保護法》第 7 條之 1 第二項規定，商品或服務不得僅因其後有較佳之商品或服務，而被視為不符合前條第一項之安全性。\n(C) 正確。改裝、分裝或變更服務內容等於重新介入商品或服務本身，故依《消費者保護法》第 8 條第二項視為第 7 條之企業經營者而負製造者責任。\n(D) 錯在把限制說成可以約定。《消費者保護法》第 10 條之 1 規定，該節所定企業經營者對消費者或第三人之損害賠償責任，不得預先約定限制或免除，限制與免除一律禁止。\n【記憶點】無過失只能減不能免、後出的更好不代表舊的不安全、動手改裝就當製造者、責任不准事先打折。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-025","關於定型化契約審閱期的敘述，下列何者正確？",25,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-027","針對臺灣社會發生食品安全問題（如黑心油），消費者得依消費者保護法第 50 條所定消費者保護團體訴訟（以下簡稱「消保團體訴訟」）尋求救濟。下列敘述何者正確？",27,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-024","未經消費者要約而對之郵寄或投遞之商品，寄送人未經消費者通知取回，在寄送後逾多少時間未經消費者表示承諾，而仍不取回其商品者，視為拋棄其寄投之商品：",24,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-028","企業經營者於下列違反消費者保護法之情形，何者所適用罰則所定之法定罰鍰額度為最高？",28,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-023","依消費者保護法規定，企業經營者與消費者分期付款買賣契約的敘述，下列何者正確？",23,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-029","依消費者保護法規定，定型化契約條款於下列何種情形，可認為並非違反平等互惠原則？",29,[51],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-106-1-brokerage-law-026",106,"下列何者不是消費者保護法第 12 條所規定推定定型化契約條款顯失公平之情形？",1786689136289]