[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":51},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-105-1-brokerage-law-028":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"不動產經紀相關法規概要","brokerage-law","經紀相關法規 · Brokerage Regulation","經紀相關法規","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-105-1-不動產經紀相關法規概要-028","house-105-1-brokerage-law-028",105,1,28,"企業經營者於下列違反消費者保護法之情形，何者所適用罰則所定之法定罰鍰額度為最高？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"地方政府針對企業經營者提供之商品或服務，經調查認為確有損害消費者身體健康者，命其為限期回收或其他必要處置，而企業經營者拒不遵從者","企業經營者未依商品標示法等法令為商品或服務之標示","企業經營者對消費者保證商品或服務之品質時，未主動出具書面保證書","企業經營者使用定型化契約時，拒絕、規避或阻撓主管機關之派員查核","A",null,"本題考點：消費者保護法罰則章各條的罰鍰級距比較，要把違規行為先歸到正確的義務條文，再對應到各自的罰則。\n【正解理由】依《消費者保護法》第 36 條，直轄市或縣（市）政府經調查認為確有損害消費者生命、身體、健康或財產或確有損害之虞者，應命其限期改善、回收或銷燬；企業經營者違反該命令，依同法第 58 條處新臺幣六萬元以上一百五十萬元以下罰鍰，並得按次處罰。這是四個選項中法定額度最高者，故選 A。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 正確。拒不遵從限期回收的命令，落在《消費者保護法》第 58 條的新臺幣六萬元以上一百五十萬元以下，上限一百五十萬元為四者之最。\n(B) 未依商品標示法等法令為標示，違反的是《消費者保護法》第 24 條第一項的標示義務，其罰鍰級距低於同法第 58 條所定的六萬元至一百五十萬元。\n(C) 保證商品或服務品質時未主動出具書面保證書，違反的是《消費者保護法》第 25 條第一項，其罰鍰級距同樣低於同法第 58 條所定的六萬元至一百五十萬元。\n(D) 拒絕、規避或阻撓主管機關派員查核定型化契約，依《消費者保護法》第 57 條處新臺幣三萬元以上三十萬元以下罰鍰並得按次處罰，上限三十萬元低於 (A) 的一百五十萬元。\n【記憶點】危害人身的命令最重：不聽回收令六萬到一百五十萬，擋查核三萬到三十萬。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-027","針對臺灣社會發生食品安全問題（如黑心油），消費者得依消費者保護法第 50 條所定消費者保護團體訴訟（以下簡稱「消保團體訴訟」）尋求救濟。下列敘述何者正確？",27,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-029","依消費者保護法規定，定型化契約條款於下列何種情形，可認為並非違反平等互惠原則？",29,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-026","依消費者保護法規定，下列敘述何者正確？",26,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-030","甲於乙商店購得丙手機公司所生產之新型手機，甲交予其子丁使用，詎料丁於使用時竟發生手機電池燃燒，致丁受傷送醫。依消費者保護法規定，關於本案中企業經營者責任之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",30,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-025","關於定型化契約審閱期的敘述，下列何者正確？",25,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-031","關於公寓大廈住戶行為規範之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",31,[],1786689136302]