[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-105-1-civil-law-015":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-105-1-民法概要-015","house-105-1-civil-law-015",105,1,15,"依侵權行為請求損害賠償之說明，下列敘述何者正確？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"純粹經濟上之損失亦屬於一種損害，與權利受損一樣，得依民法第 184 條第 1 項前段主張之","債權亦屬於一種財產權，被侵害時，祗得依民法第 184 條第 1 項前段主張，而不得依同條項後段主張之","我國侵權行為之保護客體僅限於權利，未及於利益","故意以背於善良風俗之方法加損害於他人之利益，受害人亦得依侵權行為主張之","D",null,"本題考點：《民法》第 184 條第一項前段與後段在保護客體上的差別，也就是「權利」與「利益」的分界。\n【正解理由】依《民法》第 184 條第一項，因故意或過失，不法侵害他人之權利者，負損害賠償責任；故意以背於善良風俗之方法，加損害於他人者亦同。後段的文字是「加損害於他人」，並未限定被害者須有特定權利受侵害，因此純粹的利益受害亦在射程之內，代價是主觀要件提高為故意，且手段須背於善良風俗，故選 D。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 純粹經濟上損失並非特定權利受侵害，不能逕依《民法》第 184 條第一項前段主張，須改循同項後段或同條第二項的違反保護他人之法律。\n(B) 債權雖屬財產權，但非前段所典型保護的絕對權；第三人侵害債權時，多循《民法》第 184 條第一項後段或同條第二項處理，本項把後段完全排除並不正確。\n(C) 《民法》第 184 條第一項後段與同條第二項均以「損害」為要件而不以權利受侵害為限，保護客體並非僅止於權利。\n(D) 故意以背於善良風俗之方法加損害於他人之利益，正是《民法》第 184 條第一項後段所規範的類型，本項正確。\n【記憶點】前段護「權利」、後段護「利益」，後段的入場費是故意加上背俗手段。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-014","甲欲向乙租屋 3 年，雙方僅用通訊軟體 Line 互相協商，乙已於對話中允諾，但後來丙出更高租金，於是乙改將該屋出租給丙並交付之，後來丙得乙之同意將該屋再出租給丁，某日丁因大意未關爐火將該屋燒毀，下列敘述何者正確？",14,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-016","有關民法第 250 條規定之違約金類型有「損害賠償總額預定違約金」與「懲罰性違約金」兩種，下列敘述何者正確？",16,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-013","有關不當得利所應返還之客體，下列何者錯誤？",13,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-017","若買賣標的物為特定物時，買受人不得請求下列那一種物的瑕疵擔保之法定效果？",17,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-012","依現行民法規定，有關違反法定要式規定之法律行為效力，下列何者應為無效？",12,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-018","甲將透天厝（不含基地）立約賣給乙後，尚未交付予乙前，即逢超級強烈颱風來襲，致透天厝完全倒塌。下列敘述何者正確？",18,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-civil-law-015",114,"依現行民法物權編有關不動產所有權相鄰關係規定之內容，下列之選項，何者正確？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-civil-law-015",113,"甲以行使普通地上權之意思，二十年間和平、公然、繼續在乙已登記之 A 地上有 B 屋，下列敘述，何者正確？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-112-1-civil-law-015",112,"甲於民國（下同）107 年 9 月間向乙租車公司租用自小客車環島，然卻積欠乙租金新臺幣 3 萬元，乙於 108 年 9 月催告後甲仍不為給付，乙便於 109 年 8 月訴請甲給付租金，於 110 年 9 月獲勝訴判決確定。下列何者正確？",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-111-1-civil-law-015",111,"甲與乙結婚，生有三個女兒丙、丁、戊。丙因未婚生有二子庚及辛，曾與其母乙發生重大爭吵及言語侮辱情事，而遭甲表示剝奪其繼承權。丁則於甲生前即已向甲表示，當甲百年後將拋棄繼承權。設甲死亡時留有遺產現金 600 萬元，並未立有遺囑。問:甲之遺產依法應如何分配？",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-110-1-civil-law-015",110,"關於買賣瑕疵擔保的敘述，下列何者正確？",1786689128386]