[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":55},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-105-1-civil-law-035":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-105-1-民法概要-035","house-105-1-civil-law-035",105,1,35,"下列何者屬於剩餘財產分配請求權之標的財產？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"婚前財產","婚後之薪資所得","婚後因繼承所得之財產","婚後所取得之慰撫金","B",null,"本題考點：剩餘財產分配請求權的計算標的，以及法條明文排除的兩款財產。\n【正解理由】依《民法》第 1030-1 條第一項，法定財產制關係消滅時，夫或妻現存之婚後財產，扣除婚姻關係存續所負債務後，如有剩餘，其雙方剩餘財產之差額應平均分配，但「一、因繼承或其他無償取得之財產。二、慰撫金」不在此限。婚後之薪資所得既屬婚姻關係存續中取得之婚後財產，又不落入該項但書兩款，自應納入分配標的，故選 B。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 婚前財產不是分配標的。《民法》第 1030-1 條第一項計算的基礎是「現存之婚後財產」，而《民法》第 1017 條第一項亦將婚前與婚後財產分別歸屬。\n(B) 婚後之薪資所得係因勞務而有償取得之婚後財產，既非無償取得，亦非慰撫金，屬應納入分配的標的。\n(C) 婚後因繼承所得之財產，正落入《民法》第 1030-1 條第一項但書第一款「因繼承或其他無償取得之財產」，應自分配標的中扣除。\n(D) 婚後所取得之慰撫金，落入《民法》第 1030-1 條第一項但書第二款「慰撫金」，同樣不列入分配。\n【記憶點】婚後自己賺的要分，白拿的與療傷的不分。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-034","有關法定夫妻財產制之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",34,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-036","隱瞞已婚之乙女與甲同居數年後，某日生下丙隨即離甲而去，甲獨力扶養丙，俟丙 19 歲生日，甲對丙告知其生母為乙，當日丙因思母心切隨即趕赴乙家要求相認，相認時刻被乙女丈夫丁撞見，一切東窗事發，乙丁大吵。過了 2 年後，上述相關人等決心為此事作一了結。試問此刻以下何人有資格提起婚生否認之訴？",36,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-033","有關夫妻財產制的規定，下列敘述何者正確？",33,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-037","依我國民法之規定，當胎兒為繼承人時，他繼承人如未保留胎兒之應繼分而分割遺產者，其分割行為之效力如何？",37,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-032","下列何者非屬我國現行民法中所規定之約定財產制？",32,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-038","甲乙為夫妻育有二女丙與丁，甲為傳香火認識已婚之戊女，同居一年後生下己男，甲把己接回家中同住將其養育成人，但丙與己相處極為不睦，丙亦曾對己口出穢言且被判刑確定，某日丙與己再起爭執，己一時失手將丙刺成重傷，丁見狀，起身亦把己刺成重傷，丁與己嗣後雙雙被判重刑確定，乙為此人倫悲劇在眾人前以不堪字眼侮辱甲，甲亦默默承受，但隔日即因傷心過度辭世。試問本案中，何人對甲無繼承權？",38,[51],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-106-1-civil-law-035",106,"下列有關意思表示之敘述，何者錯誤？",1786689128556]