[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-106-1-civil-law-018":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-106-1-民法概要-018","house-106-1-civil-law-018",106,1,18,"關於婚約下列敘述何者正確？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"婚約，得由未成年人之法定代理人代理為之","未成年人訂定婚約，無須經法定代理人之同意","婚約，得請求強迫履行","因訂定婚約而為贈與者，婚約解除時，當事人之一方，得請求他方返還贈與物","D",null,"本題考點：婚約的訂定方式、能力要件，以及婚約解除後贈與物的返還。\n【正解理由】依《民法》第 979-1 條，因訂定婚約而為贈與者，婚約無效、解除或撤銷時，當事人之一方，得請求他方返還贈與物。婚約解除既是該條明列的三種情形之一，因訂婚而給付的聘禮、飾金自得請求返還，故選 D。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 錯誤。《民法》第 972 條規定婚約應由男女當事人自行訂定，婚約是重視本人意思的身分行為，法定代理人不能代未成年人訂立。\n(B) 錯誤。《民法》第 974 條規定未成年人訂定婚約，應得法定代理人之同意，並非無須同意。\n(C) 錯誤。《民法》第 975 條規定婚約不得請求強迫履行，是否進入婚姻須出於當事人自由意思，不能以訴請履行的方式強制。\n(D) 正確。依《民法》第 979-1 條，婚約解除時當事人之一方得請求他方返還贈與物；此項返還與同法第 977 條的損害賠償是兩回事，後者以他方有過失為要件。\n【記憶點】婚約自己訂、未成年要同意、不能強迫履行，解除之後聘禮拿得回來。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-017","關於區分所有建築物，下列敘述何者正確？",17,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-019","關於結婚，下列敘述何者正確？",19,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-016","關於物權法定主義，下列敘述何者正確？",16,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-020","甲、乙與丙 3 人共有 A 車，應有部分各 3 分之 1，約定 A 車由丙占有、使用及收益（分管契約）。占有 A 車之丙未經甲與乙同意，出賣 A 車於丁。試問，下列敘述何者正確？",20,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-015","關於合會，下列敘述何者正確？",15,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-021","關於地上權，下列敘述何者正確？",21,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-civil-law-018",114,"關於占有，下列何者錯誤？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-civil-law-018",113,"甲向乙銀行借貸新臺幣 1000 萬元，並以甲所有之 A 屋為乙設定普通抵押權。嗣後，因第三人丙之過失，致 A 屋滅失，下列敘述，何者正確？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-112-1-civil-law-018",112,"關於民法區分所有建築物規定之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-111-1-civil-law-018",111,"甲將其 A 地設定地上權予乙，乙於 A 土地上興建 B 屋一棟。其後甲為貸款擔保而將其 A 地設定抵押權予丙，乙亦因其貸款擔保而將 B 屋設定抵押權予丁。下列敘述何者正確？",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-110-1-civil-law-018",110,"依民法第 880 條規定，實行抵押權期間以抵押權擔保之債權，其請求權已因時效而消滅，如抵押權人，於消滅時效完成後，幾年間不實行其抵押權者，其抵押權消滅？",1786689128064]