[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":55},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-106-1-civil-law-028":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-106-1-民法概要-028","house-106-1-civil-law-028",106,1,28,"依民法規定，無權占有人返還占有物於回復請求人時，其得向回復請求人主張之權利及應負擔之義務，下列敘述何者正確？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"善意占有人對於占有物支出之必要費用，於扣除其所收取孳息之餘額，皆得請求償還","善意占有人對於占有物因改良占有物支出之有益費用，於扣除其所收取孳息之餘額，皆得請求償還","惡意占有人對於占有物孳息之收取，推定其適法有此權利，無須返還","惡意占有人，就占有物之滅失或毀損，縱使非因可歸責於自己之事由所致者，負損害賠償之責任","A",null,"本題考點：善意占有人與惡意占有人在孳息、必要費用、有益費用與毀損滅失責任上的分界。【正解理由】依《民法》第 954 條，善意占有人因保存占有物所支出之必要費用，得向回復請求人請求償還，但已就占有物取得孳息者，不得請求償還通常必要費用。孳息既先與通常必要費用相抵，善意占有人所能請求的即為扣除孳息後的餘額，本項與該條規範一致，故選 A。【逐項排除】(A) 敘述正確，理由如上。(B) 敘述錯誤。有益費用適用《民法》第 955 條，善意占有人因改良占有物所支出之有益費用，須於占有物現存之增加價值限度內，向回復請求人請求償還，限制的是現存增值，而非扣除孳息後的餘額。(C) 敘述錯誤。《民法》第 958 條明定惡意占有人負返還孳息之義務，其孳息如已消費，或因其過失而毀損，或怠於收取者，並負償還孳息價金之義務。(D) 敘述錯誤。《民法》第 956 條規定惡意占有人就占有物之滅失或毀損，以係因可歸責於自己之事由所致者為限，始對回復請求人負賠償之責。【記憶點】必要費用先被孳息吃掉；有益費用看現存增值；惡意占有人賠償仍以可歸責為前提。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-027","關於撤銷權之性質，下列敘述何者錯誤？",27,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-029","依民法之規定，稱典權者，謂支付典價在他人之不動產為使用、收益，於他人不回贖時，取得該不動產所有權之權。下列關於典權之敘述，何者錯誤？",29,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-026","依民法之規定，法定要式行為有使用文字之必要時，下述情形何者錯誤？",26,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-030","19 歲之甲經父母同意受僱於乙公司。某日甲受乙公司之吩咐，將貨物送到客戶手中。途中行經十字路口，甲闖紅燈致丙在綠燈穿越時受傷，經該地區行車事故鑑定委員會認定，認定甲應負全部之肇事責任。就此情形，下列敘述何者錯誤？",30,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-025","依民法規定，關於一定之數量有文字與號碼不符合之情形時，下列敘述何者錯誤？",25,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-031","就賣方甲與買方乙間訂立之買賣契約，下列敘述何者錯誤？",31,[51],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-105-1-civil-law-028",105,"乙將其所有汽車為甲設定動產質權，以為其對甲借款債務之擔保。該車並已交付甲之占有。下列那種情形，甲之動產質權並不消滅？",1786689128159]