[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":55},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-106-1-civil-law-040":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-106-1-民法概要-040","house-106-1-civil-law-040",106,1,40,"下列有關人格權之敘述，何者錯誤？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"姓名乃用以區別人己之一種語言標誌，將人個別化，以確定其人之同一性","法人在法令限制與性質範圍內，亦享有人格權","公司名稱用以識別企業之主體性，此時姓名權等於商標權","針對無涉公益之報導，若不當揭載足資識別當事人資料，侵害其名譽權者，得依民法第 18 條請求排除侵害","C",null,"本題考點：姓名權的性質與救濟、法人的人格權範圍，以及姓名權與商標權的區別。\n【正解理由】依《民法》第 19 條，姓名權受侵害者，得請求法院除去其侵害，並得請求損害賠償。姓名權屬於人格權，所保護者為權利主體的同一性與識別利益；商標權則是《商標法》上的財產權，須經註冊取得，並得授權他人使用或移轉。兩者的權利性質、取得方式與保護客體均不相同，不能劃上等號，故選 C。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 姓名的作用在於區別人己、將人個別化並確定其人的同一性，這正是《民法》第 19 條所保護的識別利益。本項正確。\n(B) 依《民法》第 26 條，法人於法令限制內，有享受權利負擔義務之能力，但專屬於自然人之權利義務不在此限；名稱、名譽、信用等非專屬自然人的人格法益，法人亦得享有。本項正確。\n(C) 公司名稱固然具有識別企業主體的作用，但識別功能相近並不等於權利種類相同。\n(D) 依《民法》第 18 條第一項，人格權受侵害時，得請求法院除去其侵害，有受侵害之虞時，得請求防止之；報導不當揭載足資識別當事人之資料而侵害名譽權者，得據以請求排除侵害。本項正確。\n【記憶點】姓名權長在人身上，商標權長在商品上；法人也有人格權，但只到非專屬自然人的部分為止。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-039","下列有關相鄰關係之敘述，何者錯誤？",39,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":13,"year":33,"session":13},"house-107-1-civil-law-001","甲有 A、B、C 三台車，以總價 50 萬元出售給乙，其後甲將其對乙的債權贈與於丙，並讓與之。於乙將 50 萬元現金支付於丙後，甲將 A、B、C 三台車交付給乙並移轉所有權。試問甲、乙、丙間共有多少法律行為？",107,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-038","下列有關契約解除之敘述，何者錯誤？",38,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":33,"session":13},"house-107-1-civil-law-002","A 公司董事長甲於 5 月 1 日上午告訴其助理乙致函於丙，表示願以一億元購買其工廠。乙於 5 月 2 日上午發信，信於 5 月 4 日到達丙處。經查，甲於 5 月 2 日晚上心肌梗塞死亡，丙於 5 月 6 日函覆 A 公司為承諾，試問買賣契約是否成立？",2,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-037","下列有關抵押權之敘述，何者正確？",37,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":33,"session":13},"house-107-1-civil-law-003","下列有關使者之敘述，何者錯誤？",3,[51],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-105-1-civil-law-040",105,"下列那種情形，甲所立的遺囑為有效？",1786689128265]