[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-108-1-civil-law-010":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-108-1-民法概要-010","house-108-1-civil-law-010",108,1,10,"甲未婚生有乙、丙、丁三子，某日甲因細故與乙口角，乙遂憤而毆打甲成傷，當時丙雖在場，然畏懼乙身強體壯，並未勸阻。甲心灰意冷，當場表示自己百年後，乙不得繼承其財產；事後更逢人便訴說丙也不孝，未挺身護甲。丙得知此事甚為憤怒，認為自己僅求自保並沒有錯，遂在某日憤而持刀殺甲，經丁阻止而未得逞，但日後仍經法院判決殺人未遂而受刑之宣告確定。不久甲因年老體衰而去世，請問下列敘述，何者正確？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"甲僅表示乙不得繼承其財產，未表示丙不得繼承，故丙仍可繼承其財產","甲雖表示乙不得繼承其財產，但並未追訴乙之傷害罪，乙既未受刑之宣告，故乙仍得繼承甲的財產","甲若宥恕丙之行為，則乙、丙、丁三人可以一起繼承甲的財產","僅有丁可以繼承甲的財產","D",null,"本題考點：《民法》第 1145 條繼承權喪失的五款事由，以及第二項宥恕規定只救得回哪幾款。\n【正解理由】依《民法》第 1145 條第一項第五款，對於被繼承人有重大之虐待或侮辱情事，經被繼承人表示其不得繼承者，喪失其繼承權；乙毆打甲成傷，甲並當場表示乙不得繼承，該款要件齊備。丙持刀殺甲未遂，並經法院判決殺人未遂而受刑之宣告確定，則落入同條第一項第一款「故意致被繼承人或應繼承人於死或雖未致死因而受刑之宣告者」。乙、丙均喪失繼承權，只剩出面阻止的丁具繼承人資格，故選 D。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 丙的喪失事由是《民法》第 1145 條第一項第一款，有故意殺害行為且因而受刑之宣告即生效果，不以被繼承人另為表示為必要，本項推論與該款不合。\n(B) 《民法》第 1145 條第一項第五款並不要求受刑之宣告，只要有重大虐待或侮辱情事並經被繼承人表示其不得繼承即已成立，乙仍喪失繼承權。\n(C) 《民法》第 1145 條第二項的宥恕只適用於第一項第二款至第四款，第一款不在其列，甲縱使宥恕丙，丙的繼承權亦不因此回復。\n(D) 乙依《民法》第 1145 條第一項第五款、丙依同條第一項第一款均喪失繼承權，僅丁得繼承，敘述正確。\n【記憶點】五款喪失事由裡，只有第二款到第四款能靠宥恕救回來。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-108-1-civil-law-009","依我國民法之規定，下列關於租賃契約之敘述何者正確？",9,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-108-1-civil-law-011","依我國民法之規定，下列關於居間契約之敘述何者錯誤？",11,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-108-1-civil-law-008","依我國民法，下列關於地上權之敘述，何者錯誤？",8,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-108-1-civil-law-012","10 歲的男童 A 去同學 B 家中一起打電動遊戲時，因一言不合吵起來，一氣之下摔壞 B 父甲新購買的筆電。請問下列敘述何者錯誤？",12,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-108-1-civil-law-007","依我國民法的規定，下列關於抵押權之敘述，何者錯誤？",7,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-108-1-civil-law-013","甲並無將其所有價值十萬元之 A 手錶出售的意思，卻向乙表示欲以五千元出售之，乙明知甲無出售 A 手錶之意思，仍當場表示願意以五千元購買時，甲出售 A 手錶之意思表示的效力如何？",13,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-civil-law-010",114,"下述情形，何者不符合我國民法侵權行為之規定？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-civil-law-010",113,"有關意思表示之敘述，下列何者正確？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-112-1-civil-law-010",112,"為動產物權讓與之交付，倘受讓人已先占有動產，於讓與合意時即生動產所有權取得之效力，學理上稱之為何？",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-111-1-civil-law-010",111,"依現行民法有關住所之規定，下列何者錯誤？",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-110-1-civil-law-010",110,"下列何者屬於授與代理權？",1786689127502]