[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-108-1-civil-law-014":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-108-1-民法概要-014","house-108-1-civil-law-014",108,1,14,"甲授與甫滿十八歲之乙代理權，由乙處理出售甲所有之 A 機車的事宜。乙乃以甲之代理人的名義，以一萬元價金與丙訂立買賣 A 機車的契約。乙與丙所締結之買賣契約的效力如何？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"對甲發生效力","甲未承認前，效力未定","乙之法定代理人未承認前，效力未定","乙之法定代理人得撤銷之","A",null,"本題考點：《民法》第 104 條，代理人縱為限制行為能力人，其所為意思表示的效力不受影響。\n【正解理由】乙甫滿十八歲，於本題考試當時仍為未成年人，依《民法》第 13 條第二項為限制行為能力人。惟依《民法》第 104 條，「代理人所為或所受意思表示之效力，不因其為限制行為能力人而受影響」；再依《民法》第 103 條第一項，代理人於代理權限內，以本人名義所為之意思表示，直接對本人發生效力。乙既受甲授與代理權，並以甲之代理人名義與丙訂約，該買賣契約的效力直接歸屬於甲，故選 A。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 正確。乙在代理權限內以本人名義訂約，依《民法》第 103 條第一項效力直接對甲發生。\n(B) 錯誤。甲已授與乙代理權，乙是有權代理而非無權代理，契約自始對甲生效，不待甲承認。\n(C) 錯誤。《民法》第 104 條的作用正是把代理人的行為能力排除於效力判斷之外，故不生乙之法定代理人承認與否的問題。\n(D) 錯誤。撤銷須有法律上的依據，本件契約的效果既不歸屬於乙，乙之法定代理人對該買賣契約亦無撤銷之可言。\n【記憶點】限制行為能力人替自己簽約要大人點頭，替別人當代理人卻完全有效。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-108-1-civil-law-013","甲並無將其所有價值十萬元之 A 手錶出售的意思，卻向乙表示欲以五千元出售之，乙明知甲無出售 A 手錶之意思，仍當場表示願意以五千元購買時，甲出售 A 手錶之意思表示的效力如何？",13,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-108-1-civil-law-015","甲、乙締結買賣甲所有之 A 屋的契約，乙並先為部分價金之給付。其後，乙未依約定期限給付剩餘價金。就甲以乙履行遲延而解除 A 屋買賣契約之情形，下列敘述，何者正確？",15,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-108-1-civil-law-012","10 歲的男童 A 去同學 B 家中一起打電動遊戲時，因一言不合吵起來，一氣之下摔壞 B 父甲新購買的筆電。請問下列敘述何者錯誤？",12,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-108-1-civil-law-016","就下列甲、乙間之法律關係，何者為非經登記不生效力的情形？",16,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-108-1-civil-law-011","依我國民法之規定，下列關於居間契約之敘述何者錯誤？",11,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-108-1-civil-law-017","就甲、乙、丙三人對丁負有平均分擔之 300 萬元連帶債務的情形，下列敘述，何者正確？",17,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-civil-law-014",114,"甲、乙兩人合夥開了一家小麵館 M，生意興隆。下列何者錯誤？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-civil-law-014",113,"甲乙丙丁分別共有 A 地，甲以乙丙丁為被告提起分割共有物之訴，獲得勝訴確定判決。下列敘述，何者正確？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-112-1-civil-law-014",112,"民法關於死亡宣告的規定，下列何者正確？",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-111-1-civil-law-014",111,"關於共有不動產分管契約之敘述，下列何者正確？",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-110-1-civil-law-014",110,"關於合夥的敘述，下列何者正確？",1786689127540]