[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-108-1-civil-law-015":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-108-1-民法概要-015","house-108-1-civil-law-015",108,1,15,"甲、乙締結買賣甲所有之 A 屋的契約，乙並先為部分價金之給付。其後，乙未依約定期限給付剩餘價金。就甲以乙履行遲延而解除 A 屋買賣契約之情形，下列敘述，何者正確？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"經甲定期間催告乙履行，甲得於經相當期限後，不須再為催告，即得解除契約","甲僅限於法律規定之事由始得解除，不得與乙約定合意解除之事由","契約經解除後，甲、乙互負回復原狀的義務，甲不得向乙請求損害賠償","契約經解除後，因乙有可歸責事由，甲返還乙已給付之價金時，不須附加利息","A",null,"本題考點：《民法》第 254 條給付遲延的法定解除權，催告並定相當期限後，期限經過即得解除契約。\n【正解理由】依《民法》第 254 條，「契約當事人之一方遲延給付者，他方當事人得定相當期限催告其履行，如於期限內不履行時，得解除其契約」。條文的要件是遲延、定相當期限催告、期限內不履行三段，只要求一次催告，並未要求解除前再為第二次催告。甲已定期間催告乙履行，相當期限經過而乙仍未給付剩餘價金，甲即得逕行解除契約，故選 A。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 正確。與《民法》第 254 條「定相當期限催告、期限內不履行、得解除其契約」的三段要件完全相符。\n(B) 錯誤。《民法》第 258 條第一項就解除權之行使並未限於法律所定之事由，當事人約定解除事由或事後合意解除，均在契約自由的範圍內。\n(C) 錯誤。契約解除後雙方固應依《民法》第 259 條負回復原狀之義務，但回復原狀處理的是給付的返還，與違約所生損害的填補是不同的請求權，甲並未因解除而喪失損害賠償請求權。\n(D) 錯誤。依《民法》第 259 條第二款，受領之給付為金錢者，應附加自受領時起之利息償還之，甲返還價金仍須附加利息，該款並未因乙有可歸責事由而設例外。\n【記憶點】遲延解約先催告，催告一次就夠；解約後退錢，本金與利息一起退。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-108-1-civil-law-014","甲授與甫滿十八歲之乙代理權，由乙處理出售甲所有之 A 機車的事宜。乙乃以甲之代理人的名義，以一萬元價金與丙訂立買賣 A 機車的契約。乙與丙所締結之買賣契約的效力如何？",14,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-108-1-civil-law-016","就下列甲、乙間之法律關係，何者為非經登記不生效力的情形？",16,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-108-1-civil-law-013","甲並無將其所有價值十萬元之 A 手錶出售的意思，卻向乙表示欲以五千元出售之，乙明知甲無出售 A 手錶之意思，仍當場表示願意以五千元購買時，甲出售 A 手錶之意思表示的效力如何？",13,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-108-1-civil-law-017","就甲、乙、丙三人對丁負有平均分擔之 300 萬元連帶債務的情形，下列敘述，何者正確？",17,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-108-1-civil-law-012","10 歲的男童 A 去同學 B 家中一起打電動遊戲時，因一言不合吵起來，一氣之下摔壞 B 父甲新購買的筆電。請問下列敘述何者錯誤？",12,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-108-1-civil-law-018","甲、乙分別共有 A 地，各有二分之一應有部分。在甲乙未有任何協議之情形下，下列敘述，何者正確？",18,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-civil-law-015",114,"依現行民法物權編有關不動產所有權相鄰關係規定之內容，下列之選項，何者正確？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-civil-law-015",113,"甲以行使普通地上權之意思，二十年間和平、公然、繼續在乙已登記之 A 地上有 B 屋，下列敘述，何者正確？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-112-1-civil-law-015",112,"甲於民國（下同）107 年 9 月間向乙租車公司租用自小客車環島，然卻積欠乙租金新臺幣 3 萬元，乙於 108 年 9 月催告後甲仍不為給付，乙便於 109 年 8 月訴請甲給付租金，於 110 年 9 月獲勝訴判決確定。下列何者正確？",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-111-1-civil-law-015",111,"甲與乙結婚，生有三個女兒丙、丁、戊。丙因未婚生有二子庚及辛，曾與其母乙發生重大爭吵及言語侮辱情事，而遭甲表示剝奪其繼承權。丁則於甲生前即已向甲表示，當甲百年後將拋棄繼承權。設甲死亡時留有遺產現金 600 萬元，並未立有遺囑。問:甲之遺產依法應如何分配？",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-110-1-civil-law-015",110,"關於買賣瑕疵擔保的敘述，下列何者正確？",1786689127546]