[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-109-1-brokerage-law-005":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"不動產經紀相關法規概要","brokerage-law","經紀相關法規 · Brokerage Regulation","經紀相關法規","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-109-1-不動產經紀相關法規概要-005","house-109-1-brokerage-law-005",109,1,5,"公平交易法第二十條規定，有下列各款行為之一，而有限制競爭之虞者，事業不得為之。其事項「不」包括下列何者？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"無正當理由，對他事業給予差別待遇之行為","為加強貿易效能，而就國外商品或服務之輸入採取共同行為","以低價利誘或其他不正當方法，阻礙競爭者參與或從事競爭之行為","以損害特定事業為目的，促使他事業對該特定事業斷絕供給、購買或其他交易之行為","B",null,"本題考點：《公平交易法》第 20 條所列限制競爭行為的五款事項，以及把聯合行為許可事由誤植進來的辨別。\n【正解理由】依《公平交易法》第 20 條，「有下列各款行為之一，而有限制競爭之虞者，事業不得為之」，該條五款依序為：以損害特定事業為目的促使他事業斷絕供給、購買或其他交易；無正當理由對他事業給予差別待遇；以低價利誘或其他不正當方法阻礙競爭者參與或從事競爭；以脅迫、利誘或其他不正當方法使他事業不為價格之競爭、參與結合、聯合或為垂直限制競爭；以不正當限制交易相對人之事業活動為條件而與其交易。選項所述之輸入國外商品或服務共同行為不在五款之列，故選 B。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 屬《公平交易法》第 20 條第 2 款「無正當理由，對他事業給予差別待遇之行為」，包括在該條之內。\n(B) 該內容是《公平交易法》第 15 條第 1 項第 5 款所列、有益於整體經濟與公共利益並經申請主管機關許可後得為之的聯合行為例外事由，不是第 20 條所禁止的行為。\n(C) 屬《公平交易法》第 20 條第 3 款「以低價利誘或其他不正當方法，阻礙競爭者參與或從事競爭之行為」。\n(D) 屬《公平交易法》第 20 條第 1 款「以損害特定事業為目的，促使他事業對該特定事業斷絕供給、購買或其他交易之行為」。\n【記憶點】第 20 條五款是「斷絕、差別、低價、脅迫、限制」；「加強貿易效能」是第 15 條的許可事由。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-109-1-brokerage-law-004","根據公平交易法，二以上事業，實際上不為價格之競爭，而其全體之對外關係，具有此等規定之情形者，視為下列何者？",4,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-109-1-brokerage-law-006","關於不實廣告之敘述，下列何者正確？",6,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-109-1-brokerage-law-003","除依法辦理停業登記者外，經紀業開始營業後自行停止營業達多久以上者，直轄市或縣（市）主管機關得廢止其許可？",3,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-109-1-brokerage-law-007","事業違反公平交易法，致侵害他人權益者，如為事業之故意行為，法院得酌定損害額以上之賠償。但不得超過已證明損害額之幾倍？",7,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-109-1-brokerage-law-002","不動產經紀業管理條例所稱主管機關︰在中央為內政部；在直轄市為直轄市政府何等局處？",2,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-109-1-brokerage-law-008","依消費者保護法所提之訴訟，因企業經營者之故意所致之損害，消費者得請求損害額幾倍以下之懲罰性賠償金？",8,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-brokerage-law-005",114,"依消費者保護法之規定，企業經營者對消費者保證商品或服務之品質時，應主動出具書面保證書。該保證書應載明之事項中，不包括那一項？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-brokerage-law-005",113,"按公寓大廈之共有部分為區分所有人所分別共有。下列關於共有部分之使用、收益及處分權能之說明，何者與公寓大廈管理條例之規定不符？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-112-1-brokerage-law-005",112,"根據不動產經紀業管理條例第 24 條之 1 之現行規定，下列何者正確？",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-005",111,"依不動產經紀業管理條例關於獎懲之規定，下列敘述何者錯誤？",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-110-1-brokerage-law-005",110,"下列何者不是公寓大廈管理委員會之職務？",1786689135151]