[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-111-1-brokerage-law-021":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"不動產經紀相關法規概要","brokerage-law","經紀相關法規 · Brokerage Regulation","經紀相關法規","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-111-1-不動產經紀相關法規概要-021","house-111-1-brokerage-law-021",111,1,21,"下列有關定型化契約條款敘述中那幾項是正確的？①企業經營者在定型化契約中所用之定型化契約條款如有疑義時，條款內容應本公平之解釋，不應偏向企業經營者或消費者 ②企業經營者在與消費者訂立定型化契約前，須至少提供三十日以內之合理審閱期間，供消費者審閱全部條款內容 ③企業經營者以定型化契約條款訂定之使消費者拋棄合理審閱期間之條款為有效條款 ④定型化契約中之主要權利或義務條款，因受條款之限制，致契約之目的難以達成者顯失公平，故為無效。",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"②③","①③","②④","①②④","C",null,"本題考點：《消費者保護法》定型化契約之三大規範——條款疑義之解釋原則、契約審閱期間，以及顯失公平條款之效力。\n【正解理由】依《消費者保護法》第 11-1 條第一項，企業經營者與消費者訂立定型化契約前，應有三十日以內之合理期間，供消費者審閱全部條款內容，②之敘述與此相符；又依《消費者保護法》第 12 條第一項，定型化契約中之條款違反誠信原則，對消費者顯失公平者，無效，同條第二項第三款並明定「契約之主要權利或義務，因受條款之限制，致契約之目的難以達成者」推定其顯失公平，④之敘述即本於此，故選 C。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) ②③之組合錯誤：③違反《消費者保護法》第 11-1 條第二項「企業經營者以定型化契約條款使消費者拋棄前項權利者，無效」之明文，該條款是無效條款，不是有效條款。\n(B) ①③之組合錯誤：①誤解了解釋原則，《消費者保護法》第 11 條第二項規定，定型化契約條款如有疑義時，應為「有利於消費者」之解釋，並非不偏向任何一方的中立解釋；③如前述為無效條款。\n(C) ②之審閱期間與④之顯失公平無效，分別合於《消費者保護法》第 11-1 條第一項與第 12 條之規定，為正確組合。\n(D) 因包含①而錯誤：①之公平解釋說法，與《消費者保護法》第 11 條第二項有利於消費者解釋之明文不符。\n【記憶點】疑義解釋偏向消費者、三十日內審閱期拋棄無效、契約目的難達成即顯失公平而無效。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-020","規約除應載明專有部分及共用部分範圍外，有特定之情形，非經載明於規約者，不生效力。下列敘述何者非屬之？",20,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-022","依消費者保護法第 17 條之規定，定型化契約應記載事項，依契約之性質及目的，其內容不包括下列那一項？",22,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-019","依公寓大廈管理條例之規定，區分所有權人或住戶積欠應繳納之公共基金或應分擔或其他應負擔之費用，至少逾多少期或達相當金額，經定相當期間催告仍不給付者，管理負責人或管理委員會得訴請法院命其給付應繳之金額及遲延利息？",19,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-023","如果有一交易違反公平交易法，下列有關於行使損害賠償之敘述何者正確？",23,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-018","公寓大廈共用部分不得獨立使用供做專有部分。依公寓大廈管理條例之規定，其為特定情形者，並不得為約定專用部分。下列情形非屬前述之特定情形？",18,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-024","對經紀人違反不動產經紀業管理條例規定之懲戒，下列何者正確？",24,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-brokerage-law-021",114,"依公平交易法之規定，法院因事業違反該法之規定，致侵害他人權益者，被害人之請求，如為事業之故意行為，得依侵害情節，酌定損害額以上之賠償。但不得超過已證明損害額之幾倍？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-brokerage-law-021",113,"下列何者不是定型化契約條款推定顯失公平之情形？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-112-1-brokerage-law-021",112,"依消費者保護法規定，有關定型化契約應記載或不得記載事項之規定，下列何者正確？",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-110-1-brokerage-law-021",110,"下列有關公平交易法對於事業聯合行為規定之敘述，何者錯誤？",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-109-1-brokerage-law-021",109,"甲為 A 屋的所有權人，委託乙仲介公司幫忙賣房子。關於甲乙適用消費者保護法的情形，下列敘述何者錯誤？",1786689134840]