[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":70},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-113-1-civil-law-004":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":49,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-113-1-民法概要-004","house-113-1-civil-law-004",113,1,4,"甲對乙有新臺幣（下同）100 萬元之債權，將該債權讓與丙，甲與丙均未通知乙債權讓與之事情。嗣後，乙因不知債權讓與之事情，對甲清償 100 萬元，經甲受領，下列敘述，何者正確？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"甲與丙之債權讓與無效","乙之債務因清償而消滅","應經丙承認，乙之債務始消滅","甲與丙之債權讓與應經乙承認始生效","B",null,"本題考點：債權讓與對債務人的效力繫於通知；未通知時，債務人向原債權人清償仍生清償效力。\n【正解理由】依《民法》第 297 條第一項，債權之讓與，非經讓與人或受讓人通知債務人，對於債務人不生效力。甲與丙均未通知乙，該讓與對乙不生效力，乙眼中的債權人仍是甲；再依同法第 309 條第一項，依債務本旨向債權人或其他有受領權人為清償，經其受領者，債之關係消滅。乙已給付 100 萬元且經甲受領，其債務消滅，故選 B。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 錯誤。依《民法》第 294 條第一項，債權人得將債權讓與於第三人，甲丙間的讓與在當事人間有效；未通知的效果僅是對債務人不生效力，並非讓與無效。\n(B) 正確。乙是向《民法》第 309 條第一項所稱之債權人為清償並經其受領。\n(C) 錯誤。乙的清償效力於甲受領時即已發生，不以丙之承認為要件；《民法》第 118 條第一項的承認是無權利人處分的問題，與本題債務人清償無涉。\n(D) 錯誤。依《民法》第 294 條第一項與第 297 條第一項，債權讓與是讓與人與受讓人間的行為，對債務人只需通知，不以債務人承認或同意為生效要件。\n【記憶點】讓與在甲丙之間就生效，要拘束債務人，缺的只是那一通「通知」。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,45],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-113-1-civil-law-003","甲將其所有之名畫出租於乙，並未將代理權授與乙。詎料，乙竟以甲之代理人名義，與善意之丙訂立買賣契約，將名畫出賣並交付於丙。甲不承認乙之無權代理行為，下列敘述，何者正確？",3,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-113-1-civil-law-005","甲申請之建案因違法無法取得建造許可，遂與乙約定，由甲贈與乙之妻丙 100 萬元後，乙須幫助甲取得建造許可，後來乙收賄之行為經法院判決有罪確定。問甲可否向丙請求返還 100 萬元？",5,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-113-1-civil-law-002","有關行為能力之敘述，下列何者正確？",2,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-113-1-civil-law-006","甲無權占有乙所有已登記之 A 地 15 年後，乙對甲提起所有物返還請求之訴訟，下列敘述，何者正確？",6,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":13,"year":12,"session":13},"house-113-1-civil-law-001","甲就其所有之 A 地，先與乙訂立買賣契約，後與丙訂立買賣契約，均未辦理所有權移轉登記。關於二個買賣契約之效力，下列敘述，何者正確？",{"webId":46,"stem":47,"number":48,"year":12,"session":13},"house-113-1-civil-law-007","甲與乙訂立租賃契約，將丙所有之 A 屋出租於乙，並交付於乙。嗣後，丙對乙起訴，請求乙返還 A 屋，致乙不能為約定之使用，下列敘述，何者正確？",7,[50,54,58,62,66],{"webId":51,"year":52,"stem":53,"number":14},"house-114-1-civil-law-004",114,"甲當選 A 法人董事，準備大顯身手，下列敘述何者錯誤？",{"webId":55,"year":56,"stem":57,"number":14},"house-112-1-civil-law-004",112,"下列情形，那一行為需向法院聲請撤銷，才會發生撤銷之效力？",{"webId":59,"year":60,"stem":61,"number":14},"house-111-1-civil-law-004",111,"下列敘述，何者錯誤？",{"webId":63,"year":64,"stem":65,"number":14},"house-110-1-civil-law-004",110,"關於行為能力之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",{"webId":67,"year":68,"stem":69,"number":14},"house-109-1-civil-law-004",109,"下列有關契約成立之敘述，何者錯誤？",1786689126233]