[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-114-1-brokerage-law-021":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"不動產經紀相關法規概要","brokerage-law","經紀相關法規 · Brokerage Regulation","經紀相關法規","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-114-1-不動產經紀相關法規概要-021","house-114-1-brokerage-law-021",114,1,21,"依公平交易法之規定，法院因事業違反該法之規定，致侵害他人權益者，被害人之請求，如為事業之故意行為，得依侵害情節，酌定損害額以上之賠償。但不得超過已證明損害額之幾倍？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"二倍","三倍","五倍","十倍","B",null,"本題考點：《公平交易法》損害賠償章中，事業因故意行為侵害他人權益時，法院酌定損害額以上賠償之倍數上限。\n【正解理由】依《公平交易法》第 30 條，事業違反本法之規定，致侵害他人權益者，應負損害賠償責任；同法第 31 條第一項接著規定，法院因前條被害人之請求，如為事業之故意行為，得依侵害情節，酌定損害額以上之賠償，但不得超過已證明損害額之三倍。條文對上限的用語即是「三倍」，故選 B。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 二倍並非《公平交易法》第 31 條所定之上限，該條但書逐字寫明「不得超過已證明損害額之三倍」，二倍是無條文依據的數字。\n(B) 三倍正確，即《公平交易法》第 31 條第一項但書所定上限，且其適用以事業之故意行為為前提；若僅屬過失，法院即無酌定損害額以上賠償之空間。\n(C) 五倍是《消費者保護法》第 51 條的數字：依該法所提之訴訟，因企業經營者之故意所致之損害，消費者得請求損害額五倍以下之懲罰性賠償金，屬另一部法律之規定，非本題《公平交易法》所定。\n(D) 十倍出現在《公平交易法》第 21 條第五項但書：廣告薦證者非屬知名公眾人物、專業人士或機構者，僅於受廣告主報酬十倍之範圍內與廣告主負連帶損害賠償責任，講的是薦證者連帶責任之上限，與本題之賠償倍數無關。\n【記憶點】公平法故意侵害，法院酌定賠償以已證明損害額之三倍為上限。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-114-1-brokerage-law-020","依不動產經紀業管理條例之規定，經紀業應完成相關程序後方得營業。下列敘述，何者錯誤？",20,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-114-1-brokerage-law-022","依不動產經紀業管理條例之規定，下列那一項關於簽章之敘述錯誤？",22,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-114-1-brokerage-law-019","依不動產經紀業管理條例之規定，下列關於不動產經紀營業員之敘述，何者正確？",19,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-114-1-brokerage-law-023","不動產之買賣、互易、租賃或代理銷售，如委由經紀業仲介或代銷者，依不動產經紀業管理條例之規定，相關文件應由經紀業指派經紀人簽章。下列何者於經營代銷業務者不適用之？",23,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-114-1-brokerage-law-018","依不動產經紀業管理條例之規定，經紀人員違反下列那一選項之規定，不僅應依規定懲戒，經紀業亦將依規定處罰？",18,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-114-1-brokerage-law-024","依公平交易法之規定，下列那一個定義之內容錯誤？",24,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-113-1-brokerage-law-021",113,"下列何者不是定型化契約條款推定顯失公平之情形？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-112-1-brokerage-law-021",112,"依消費者保護法規定，有關定型化契約應記載或不得記載事項之規定，下列何者正確？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-021",111,"下列有關定型化契約條款敘述中那幾項是正確的？①企業經營者在定型化契約中所用之定型化契約條款如有疑義時，條款內容應本公平之解釋，不應偏向企業經營者或消費者 ②企業經營者在與消費者訂立定型化契約前，須至少提供三十日以內之合理審閱期間，供消費者審閱全部條款內容 ③企業經營者以定型化契約條款訂定之使消費者拋棄合理審閱期間之條款為有效條款 ④定型化契約中之主要權利或義務條款，因受條款之限制，致契約之目的難以達成者顯失公平，故為無效。",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-110-1-brokerage-law-021",110,"下列有關公平交易法對於事業聯合行為規定之敘述，何者錯誤？",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-109-1-brokerage-law-021",109,"甲為 A 屋的所有權人，委託乙仲介公司幫忙賣房子。關於甲乙適用消費者保護法的情形，下列敘述何者錯誤？",1786689134181]